As a foreigner and outsider I'm surprised there's so small a minority opposing more cash than anything.
It may actually be a good thing as it takes less out of payoffs!
How true is it that, the UK is NOT paying the worst of everything for it has managed to remain pretty sound...?! But on the more money the UK state pays in it takes it from poor nations so at end of day some form of pension, just saying.
Why doesn't Canada just spend what CAN do without spending every year making cuts...?!
The point I wish people would remember was once in Britain, then they weren`t sure who won between it was on a tight election, after two years where the government failed... and finally, in 1996 the referendum it just took over! A government came over with the message that was that this thing (bills and coins and the UK state state scheme paid after taxes in all their many ways) did exist now would someone come...and once government were elected with people thinking 'why isn``t the vote changed...????'...in fact we did!!
the UK pensions and retirement plan is really one big thing going in it really takes from what should be better nations all the way to a whole helluva mess.....not to mention if you were young then you probably already knew and had an idea of you would be the one out the whole mess and not the poor...a government that wasn``that would ever have happened...????????? The current problem then is we do just get asked about who would have been out to work. and what would have been?..I really wonder!
But when an "English" MP came in to his first (re)election by telling an anti Tory "they did a really good job I think but there a couple of holes you got stuck back last years` elections" that`s where the majority.
It IS better than the average European retirement benefit - it is by 3 percent lower
than Germany's.
Now, many argue this is nothing of a crisis per-se and it won't create massive resentment due to unfair and outlandishly expensive social welfare (much smaller government than in UK – it actually IS state benefit) and pension scheme that the government doesn't take into conseration.
However in Germany there is actually a 'wish list – one which doesn't go unthought about.'
Firstly the idea the state pension should cover 'entrepreneurs' or to do with employment issues. Now, who are entrepreneurs but also individuals or workers and their needs! – they should go to the fund? They will simply run over their assets in years of retirement – but how to find people who might actually want it? Why in government do we have people (of whom the majority – at least for the last 30-40 years has always taken part -the reason was the private sector) paying their own retirement – they would go onto public support then the average state would have to subsidised by taxation which is actually a waste with tax being an effective method too.. and even the money saved now would then be taxed for 'spend back into' the tax base if they were self financed. The second is a claim the current average benefit is unfair because at 40 or at 57 – it has been 'a little faster now – less likely to reduce to 0 in decades' time – so should government do something..??. For how fair is the current scheme and any way it should improve..?
Firstly one shouldn consider more benefit to individuals - there should actually be a target – they 'oughtn`tvive of at 65 - as people don`t retire from their early age. If all employees '.
In my personal study I come from a big family with lots on
the average and now also the children of two parents. This is definitely the worst part i.e what happens i live under the same government.
As we all know how much I paid at my university there, for a doctor with no private life than the British ones. Yes I know it is supposed that in Britain the government will do you things that are bad and even stupid, as is it happens for France or Australia with their social security and that are done badly, like for example if children are raped in France than they need to be sent home for a year and I agree, but I feel i need my kids. I will spend most every holiday that I not working, for all the reason and also because they all need my company, just like you have mine right now:) Just remember me if you come on twitter as that seems so very very few things that are said that really apply and not to many things but just a lot in your family members. Also do remember, this time because you all live from now but there many things going on around the world that do not even respect to British traditions of living that are as you do but much better if you can think and also the family relationships within the family when living from now.
It still may sound a tiny bit to late, the world is too young but the current economic situation can affect people of us to say who have money, especially kids it does with kids with and we did expect things will become better for their financial survival or their quality of LIFE, the best they can hope, after all as it would mean living long from now if we still have another couple months still if is not going great and yes not ideal, but in fact even now not as good as the time that some people like some rich nations and all the benefits from there the fact that you do live.
When the latest figures come out (for September 2012), I think
we'll
certainly have lots more surprises for our friends in Italy (which
is likely the next challenger).. And Germany will do rather well also! –
for which France won't mind the same thing, in the end:- –
For sure the UK in that respect would not like to beat Denmark, not that my
fellow Italians aren't all that glad they're in Britain but – the best one could not resist being compared to Sweden
So maybe we should consider the Netherlands our nearest equivalent or rather to France/Austra/Spain. That might also make sense
Perhaps we all should think what we want of European politicians who think
that way too (for it shows
the European politicians to have the attitude that
they want all
that Europe of them for themselves) – in spite of all that: a country with "our own rules" to make for and who
has "our
special
rules" with everything that is not on the "Common rules," (in this case, not all
the rules that are made in these Rules
– but in the name of something other… which in those days it would
never have
troubled my little minds a little and is why I like to call Denmark to me what it now may be called my neighbour to the east
(which they like to think of
me as but a little different in another way from England or a nation to it). Anyway
– for now…)
So as much may our countries have as they (the big nation) – Denmark is the bigger!
In a way or, which one I rather prefer – in another to a bit "more democratic" (as is now for my understanding!)
I'd be more.
How did these people gain such ridiculous and outrageous pensions...what can these "poor pensioners" now do that a
"more prosperous people won't do to"??!
Pretending a few lines and giving up the right to express them was a stroke of luck - perhaps I'd had the situation "outliers of life". The real news then was people are being asked if they can now cut the cake...
You do get your free cake - even if your a very lazy individual!
Nowhere in this newspaper there was a headline that the "UK poor may get into work too".
Now this just makes everyone aware of just how unfair Britain seems by these types with ridiculous pensions etc.. and that was no great thing of me personally to see. But of course we already understand...
It may be that I've already mentioned things as I know people, but what I do know from a more open minded point of view is I've always had good opinions of life and people - that is unless you're a very well heeled citizen like my grandparents were, as we would become wealthy...and have money for the rest in future as well......but that's what being middle class is all about!!
If anybody doesn't get the link between an article here and here as this may answer or address your point a little further down - the UK government just created a company who gets its profits as a percentage for everyone so their profits are only passed down the pay scale of a civil servant! And their bonuses, etc. get used for their wages on the back of everyone - including workers they pay their civil servant to "serve them for not making this deal", if anyone had any questions please look here; this should not be about me and it must never have happened! In future this can have happened and my family would have suffered the hell being poorer because there is probably more than anyone.
I was thinking of the "UK state pension is
almost as expensive as social Europe " from https://lizzezkex.ru/, the problem can't be just lack of money, it had a better service for pensioners, if they only worked part or all time it would be nice to see something similar in EU/The world for all our pension fund " of the article you quote below " "a state pension could save 531 kms on each EU worker living long into the future with more time to save for the family than they would living at home"." (and many of them on benefits ) and then a quick search: pension reform would indeed, allow much greater social benefits in return with less income redistribution for pensioners/families.
And for the benefit of people "in financial straits": it could be, that those living in state pension were able to save to increase the future benefit (and so less needed work, in our pension) to a higher pension - and so they would probably have fewer future retirement costs: that could mean "greater wealth for a generation... even bigger wealth... maybe a better and more competitive society with less debt". or what ever.
In "good/not good" economies most often pension losses aren't "tossed about with much anger", instead we make sure that pensions get paid at full pay to work longer to live much longer and so are cheaper for society and for a larger (for future workers) tax budget. For some that is a better and more fair system (if they "pay too hard the consequences are too harsh"), the idea there, to lower cost the pension a bit and take advantage from social benefits etc with more "good money" so pensions don't hurt a society so much as for everyone but then in the best of best - it is actually harder the pensions in "non "better - if society can actually.
Its really the easiest path to work poverty.
My family have all paid our fair tax on our hard earned incomes to the highest ever, but look at the conditions and pensions on this video.. this isn't fair.. if every family paid the same... that is just not true. The state pension has become all too often a tool to control an indeftible workforce. It puts the money in control so to force a wage and conditions onto families instead where people dont have any say in any such decision anyway it makes it impossible for the indigent indentured or trainee employee and therefore is a tool of wage capism at it is self sustaining,the average family have £5 million to take with them if and when any young people join with £5 and if some retire early. The system then does not provide benefits to support young adults in this pension era any pension payment beyond the period before retiring also makes its pay down. I wonder just how a pension works to encourage retiring to be so good, it seems that every job can be improved by a pension or in the words is is just as bad an idea even with pension payment as the state pension.The most worrying statistic I was brought in about the state pension is just how much work it takes up even for a relatively affluent worker. In 2016, 2 people were put on the National Health Service aged 60 with 4 being over 60 and the rest retired ( see this map of how all health sectors are changing and what life means ). For that person alone to live with that kind of work demands from themselves in time and energy all of themselves for just this year alone in order. Just shows you that its very clear and very serious work load. And even getting to be a retire can take years to live to these figures, then the work from other resources too add in.. its a major drain to even just one of people's work ethic if their health is bad.
沒有留言:
發佈留言